STRUCTURE OF JOHNÕS GOSPEL (3.22-36)
First
discourse: The idea of birth as initiation into Eternal
Life has become a kind of program of the whole work of Christ; the
narrative proceeds toward the Òelevation of the Son of ManÓ, of the ÒLove of
GodÓ for the world, and ÒlightÓ and Òjudgment.Ó The narrative passes to 3.22-36 - perhaps a fresh start, a
change of scene, a brief narrative providing the setting for a dialogue in which
the chief speaker is John, the Baptist, and a succeeding or monologue down to
verse 30. The words of the Baptist
(Jesus did not baptize like John.
He came to baptize in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit
(Matthew 28.19); this baptism will extend to all nations) seem directly
appropriate to the dramatic situation from verse 31 onward; the discourse
becomes more general and is perhaps to be regarded as representing the
evangelistÕs reflection in his own person, as distinct from the BaptistÕs
reply. It is impossible to draw a
clear line between reported dialogue or discourse and the evangelistÕs reflection,
which is marked by a vivid characterization that melts imperceptibly into the
monologue. Here Jesus, or the Baptist is speaking and here the evangelist. In the present case, however, it
contains many echoes of the ideas and language of the dialogue with Nicodemus
and the discourse following.
Perhaps these verses reveal the incarnation, ChristÕs descent
from God to man, ÒFor he whom God has sent speaks the words (lalei) of
God. Here is a description of
Christ as ÒThe Son,Ó and reference to His sending (apesteilen, 17,34); we have
references to the Son of God and to Eternal Life, to Faith and to the
Spirit.
It
is impossible to decide definitely whether the subject of the verb is God or
Christ! (e.g. JohnÕs and JesusÕ baptism compared - John baptized at Aenon near
to Salim immediately after JesusÕ temptation John was imprisoned (compare Matt.
4.11-17) If we take the latter
view then the statement is a repetition of 1.33 - Luke 4.13,14, time between
JesusÕ temptation and the arrest of John.
(houstos hesten ho baptizon en pneumate hapio) If we take the former view, the
reference is to 1.32 (to pneuma batabainon kai menon hap Ôauton), which
explains how it is that Christ is equipped to baptize (in pneumati). In either case, we are led to the
thought of Christ both as possessing the Spirit and as baptizing in the Spirit
and in consequence mediating Eternal Life to the believer (3.6).
We
can therefore conclude that the evangelistÕs intent is to link the ideas of hudor
and pneuma through the idea of baptism and in particular baptism by
Jesus in contrast to JohnÕs baptism.
Therefore we can note why the recapitulatory passage (3.31-36) with the
passage which (alone in the gospels) states that Jesus Himself baptized
(compare with 4.1 and 4.2).
It
seems best understood to regard 3.22-26 as an explanatory appendix to the
dialogue with Nicodemus and the discourse which grows out of it, the whole of
chapter 3, being concerned with the idea of Initiation into Eternal Life
(a rebirth) in conjunction with the rich complex of ideas which are for its
proper understanding.
The
classic, indispensable work of Strack and Billerbeck (Volume I, p. 590 and
Volume II, p. 558) places us in their debt. In this Johannine pericope, the divine envoy is no
more than GodÕs spokesman, the mediator of his life giving words in a world
estranged from God to a humanity in whom the anger of God has rested up to now
(vs. 36) for this very reason to call and claim of this unique Revealer and Savior
cannot be disregarded. He speaks
GodÕs word and no more. Behind
this is the old Jewish axiom, that manÕs envoy is like himself (see Billerbeck)
which is attested for Jesus in the Synoptics (Mark 9.37; Luke 9.48; Matthew 10.40)
and also used in the Johannine Jesus with even stronger emphasis (12.44f;
13.20; 15.21; 17.18; 20.21). But
the legal principle here is the vehicle of a more profound truth, the ÒenvoyÓ
is the ÒSonÓ (vs. 35ff) who is and
remains most ultimately united with the Father. To have the words of Jesus is to hear the words of God. The prophetic words and JesusÕ words
are the Word of God. Jesus
is GodÕs envoy; Òthe redeemer who is sent to speak the words of God does not
give the Spirit only in part. Here
it is emphatically declared that the Father, Son and Spirit are One.
James Strauss, Lincoln, Illinois